Every treasury conversation starts in the same place: how much cash do we have right now? It sounds beneath a CFO's attention. Yet in most companies the accurate answer takes half a morning or more to produce, and it's stale before it lands.

Multiple bank portals, across various entities and currencies. Different users, different geographies, different log-ins, different formats for the information you extract.

The shape of the problem changes as you scale.

Start-ups. Visibility is a discipline problem, not a systems problem. … read more show less

A handful of accounts across one or two banks. The information is all there; someone just has to look at it every day and, most importantly, check it against what they expected to see. Reconciling the gap between expected and actual cash is your earliest warning that the forecast is wrong or starting to drift. It costs nothing to track apart from time. Skip the habit and you find out about the problem when a payment bounces.

But a handful of accounts can grow quickly as you scale into new markets, open new entities and add bank relationships. Logging into two portals to check a few accounts is manageable; it becomes a burden fast as counterparties, accounts and currencies multiply.

Mid-size corporates. The problem turns structural. … read more show less

Multiple entities, multiple banks, multiple currencies, and cash trapped in a subsidiary account nobody looks at between month-ends. Checking balances is time-consuming; consolidating them is real work. Bank statements arrive in different formats at different times, and someone in group finance stitches them together in a spreadsheet that's out of date by Wednesday. FX starts to bite too: are you using consistent rates to convert across accounts, and how often are they refreshed?

Noise also starts to creep in. Small balances held in foreign accounts may not be easy to access, and FX conversion and settlement times have to be factored in before some balances can be used. Cash in a subsidiary simply doesn't have the same liquidity value to the group as reporting-currency cash sitting in the primary entity.

Large corporates. The problem inverts. … read more show less

Everything flows into a treasury system automatically, and the risk becomes noise: three hundred accounts reporting daily is only useful if you can cut through what's generated, and someone owns the exceptions.

The plumbing, briefly

How you actually see the cash depends on your size, too.

Start-ups. Bank portals and apps are usually enough. … read more show less

Many neobanks and start-up-focused institutions have added genuinely useful functionality, giving an aggregated view of current and historical activity across all accounts at that bank. Access often stays with the founder who opened the account — though view-only access for an accountant or fractional CFO is an increasingly common feature that takes the pressure off founders.

Mid-size corporates. Bank portals and statements still do the heavy lifting, but Open Banking adds real value. … read more show less

Open Banking lets you aggregate account data from a wide range of sources into a single view as you grow. Controlling access to those portals also becomes a bigger concern: who can log in to which account, what permissions they hold, what happens when someone with access leaves, whether anyone else can get in, and how quickly access can be revoked. It's a chore that multiplies as accounts grow, and some platforms make user-rights management far easier than others.

Large corporates. File-based statements are the standard workhorse. … read more show less

At enterprise level, the MT940 and its successor, the CAMT.053, do the standard work. Direct APIs are faster and increasingly available, though coverage across banks remains patchy. The hard work here is plumbing everything together and keeping track of new accounts; a consolidation exercise to close redundant accounts is worth doing before you tackle aggregation.

Across all three, individual portal logins with manual downloads are relied on far more than treasury managers like to admit. The blind spots are always the same: the local account opened years ago for a tax payment, the minor-currency balances too small to bother with individually but material in total, and the subsidiary that reports monthly because it always has.

That comparison — the day's cash next to the day's forecast — is where every improvement in treasury starts.

What actually needs to be reported

Visibility isn't a single number; it's a small set of numbers that changes as you scale. Seeing every balance matters less than reporting the few figures that drive decisions at your stage. What follows is the reporting minimum for each.

Start-ups. A handful of numbers, tracked daily. … read more show less
  • Total cash on hand — one consolidated figure across every account.
  • Net monthly burn — cash out less cash in, averaged over recent months.
  • Runway — months of cash left at current burn: the headline number for the founder and the board.
  • Next payroll and rent — the near-term commitments, and whether today's balance covers them.
  • Expected vs actual closing balance — the daily or weekly discipline check that flags drift early.
Mid-size corporates. The focus shifts to consolidation and the quality of cash. … read more show less
  • Consolidated group cash — broken down by entity, bank and currency.
  • Available vs restricted cash — what you can actually deploy today versus what is trapped, pledged or minimum-operating balance.
  • Cash in reporting currency — converted at a consistent, dated FX rate.
  • Net cash / net debt — cash less drawn borrowings and overdrafts.
  • Bank concentration — how much of the group's cash sits with each counterparty.
  • Actual vs forecast variance, by entity — so you can see where the drift originates.
Large corporates. Precision, liquidity and counterparty risk. … read more show less
  • Global consolidated position — daily, by entity, bank and currency.
  • Total available liquidity — cash plus undrawn committed facilities: the real capacity to act.
  • Restricted, trapped and minimum operating cash by entity — so headline cash isn't mistaken for usable cash.
  • Bank counterparty exposure and concentration — against approved limits.
  • Cash-pool and intercompany positions — notional/physical pool balances and intra-group lending.
  • Intraday position — for large payment and settlement flows.
  • Reconciliation exceptions — the count of unmatched or unexplained items, and who owns them.

Stage-by-stage summary

  Start-up Mid-size Large enterprise
Core problem Discipline, not systems Consolidation across entities Noise and exception control
Bank landscape 1–2 banks, a handful of accounts Several banks, multiple entities and currencies Dozens of banks, hundreds of accounts
How cash is seen Bank app / portal, checked daily Portals plus Open Banking aggregation Treasury system fed by MT940 / CAMT.053 and APIs
Main tools Neobank dashboards, spreadsheet Aggregation portal, group spreadsheet TMS, bank connectivity layer, ERP
FX handling Rarely an issue Consistent rates and refresh become critical Automated, rate-governed, audited
Biggest blind spot Nobody looks daily Trapped subsidiary cash, stale spreadsheet Redundant accounts, unowned exceptions
Headline number Runway (months of cash left) Available group cash, net of trapped cash Total available liquidity (cash + undrawn facilities)
Reporting cadence Daily / weekly Weekly, tightening to daily Daily, with intraday for large flows